GREEN BAY, WI - SEPTEMBER 28: The national anthem is sung prior to the NFL game between the Green Bay Packers and the Kansas City Chiefs at Lambeau Field on September 28, 2015 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

A set of Wisconsin lawmakers on Thursday proposed a bill that will require the national anthem to precede any sporting occasion at the nation that receives government cash.

These are Republicans.

“Hearing the Star Spangled Banner in a sporting occasion reminds us that despite our differences, we’ve got something in common — we’re Americans,” Testin stated. “This heritage traces its origins back over a century — even pre-dating the tune’s adoption as the national anthem. It is a practice that joins usand I feel it is well worth preserving.”

As stated by the Associated Press, Testin’s invoice”only says” as follows:”No sporting event might be held at a place the structure of which was funded in part from moneys led by a state agency or local governmental unit unless case is preceded by the singing or playing of the national anthem.”

Testin points out that his bill language facially needs the national anthem to be performed all Green Bay Packers NFL games.

Brown County, Wis. taxpayers financed the reconstruction of Lambeau Field via an Extra Soccer Stadium District taxation of 0.5% between the years 2000 and 2015.

However, since the AP reported, the bill doesn’t rigorously define what is and isn’t a”sporting occasion ” That lack of emotion”rais[es] the matter of if the anthem would need to be sung each time somebody gets to get a pickup game of soccer in the town park or plays with a playoff game onto a municipal area,” that the AP wondered. The wire service also said that the bill in its present form also doesn’t take a penalty.

Wisconsin law requires colleges to”provide” the national anthem or the Pledge of Allegiance”every school day.” However, the legislation includes spiritual exemptions for private schools. Additionally, it says students can’t be forced against their particular objections or the understanding of the parents”to recite the pledge or to sing the anthem.”

It’s uncertain whether Testin’s invoice conveys similar exemptions. A complete text version of the proposition hasn’t, at the time of the writing, been added into the state site which monitors legislation.

That step was widely criticized . In summary, the government can’t compel language; Law&Crime’s complete legal investigation which followed Patrick’s remarks is here.

Patrick’s remarks came following Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban declared his group would no longer perform with the anthem.

Testin’s suggestion was immediately ratioed by Twitter consumers:

Emails from Law&Crime seeking a copy of the invoice and comment regarding its constitutionality have likewise and thus much gone unreturned.